![]() |
[ Home Page | Message Boards | News | Archive | Ask Cecil | Books | Buy Stuff | FAQs, etc. ]
03-Mar-1981
Dear Cecil:
I don't want to get your column embroiled in biblical debates, but
I must know the answer to a question that has been bothering me for
some time. I need to know if the Egyptians record the Jewish Exodus
in their ancient historical documents. If so, does it differ from
the historical accounts? Do they record a "Moses" raised as a
pharoah's son? Did they notice that they were hit with ten plagues?
Finally, do they record the destruction of the Egyptian army in the
Red Sea? --Rufino O., Chicago
Dear Rufino:
If you're hoping for a clipping from the Egyptian News-Gazette
reporting a spate of unusual weather--e.g., partly sunny with
occasional torrents of fire--I have to disappoint you.
Apart from the Old Testament and related sources, there are only a
few surviving records of any sort from the Mosaic era, mostly in
the form of inscribed stone slabs called stelae.
There's a large body of Hellenic literature dealing with Moses,
but all of it was written long after the fact and was considerably
embroidered in the process. One stela from the reign of Merneptah
(1235-1227 BC, thought to be roughly the time of Exodus) does refer
to the nomad tribe of Israel, but claims to have destroyed it.
Plainly the war correspondence of the time was no more reliable
than that of the present era.
Despite the lack of primary source material, there have been many efforts over the years to relate biblical places and
events to their historical counterparts, with mixed success. To
this day there remains wide disagreement as to the precise identity
of such basic landmarks as the Sea of Reeds (it certainly wasn't
the Red Sea) and Mount Sinai.
One school of thought holds that Moses cunningly led his people
across the Gulf of Suez at ebb tide, then watched as the water rose
to its customary six and a half feet and drowned the pursuing
Egyptians. This hypothesis fails to account for the mighty wind
that supposedly parted the waters to begin with.
Another theory has it that the Israelites crossed Lake Subonis,
which is (or was) separated from the Mediterranean by a narrow
isthmus. The surrounding land is swampy and treacherous and the
isthmus itself is frequently submerged during storms; it's easy to imagine an appropriate scenario.
Of course, the fact that there is no historical evidence for the
existence of Moses or the ten plagues doesn't necessarily mean they were purely mythical. There's little historical evidence
to establish the existence of anybody from the period, except for
those who happened to be head honcho at some point.
On the other hand, it seems likely that much of the detail of the
biblical account was borrowed from Egyptian sources. The name "Moses"
apparently derives from the common Egyptian suffix -mose, "born
of," as in Thut-mose, "born of the god Thut." The Old Testament
claim that the name comes from the Hebrew mashah is thought to be
wishful thinking. The story of the infant Moses's rescue from the
canebrake, interestingly, parallels the Egyptian legend of the
goddess Isis, who hid her son Horus in a delta papyrus thicket to
protect him from some nasty fate.
The ten plagues described in the biblical account--lice,
pestilence, locusts, boils, and so on--are all commonplace
features of Egyptian life. The first plague, for
instance, when Moses turns the waters of the Nile to blood, most
likely recalls the fact that the Nile turns red during the spring
floods due to floating microorganisms. A simple explanation of the plagues, then, is Moses' willingness to take credit for the routine
disasters of the day. No wonder the Israelites wanted out.
--CECIL ADAMS
The Straight Dope / Questions or
comments for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com
Comments regarding this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com
Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2002 Chicago Reader, Inc. All rights reserved.
No material contained in this site may be republished or reposted without express written
permission.
The Straight Dope is a registered trademark of Chicago
Reader, Inc.