Is anybody in charge of keeping satellites from colliding?

December 26, 2008

Dear Cecil:

As I stare into the beautiful dark sky above my home in Hawaii and see all the stars and satellites, I ponder the possibility of "space accidents." With all those satellites up there, are there any collisions? I don't suppose anybody is handing out OUIs (for orbiting under the influence), but how do they decide what satellite should go where? Who oversees all those orbits? Is it just a stellar free-for-all?

Cecil replies:

No, but it's not iron discipline either. To date we've been content to let just about anybody heave stuff into orbit, requiring only minimal reporting for most launches. But with increasing commercialization of space, things are starting to get crowded up there — the Union of Concerned Scientists lists 898 active satellites, operated by everybody from the U.S. to Luxembourg. Given the vastness of space, even in earth's immediate vicinity, it's not like we're talking bumper-to-bumper traffic. But consider:

(1) Those 898 satellites constitute only a fraction of orbiting objects. The North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) currently tracks about 13,000 spaceborne items, mostly junk. The French space agency CNES estimates there are 300,000 items of space debris larger than 1 cm, and 30 million larger than 1 mm.

(2) Satellites are expensive — the huge ones, like Europe's Envisat, can cost billions, and just putting something, anything, into orbit is likely to run you (per one NASA estimate) between $50 million and $400 million.

(3) Orbiting objects travel at tens of thousands of miles per hour. If two of them collide, they're both going to be moving at a good clip, so the net impact speed of a glancing blow won't necessarily be that high. But even if something merely sideswipes your $500 million orbiting investment, chances are it's hosed.

(4) Some space scientists fear the quantity of orbital junk is nearing a critical threshold, in which collisions between spaceborne objects occur so frequently, creating ever more fragments, that a chain reaction results, threatening future space exploration. This cascading effect is known as the Kessler syndrome, after former NASA scientist Donald Kessler, co-author of an early paper describing the threat.

In short, the day may not be far off when we'll need space traffic control — in fact people have been thinking along these lines for a long time. In 1959 the United Nations recommended that rules be drawn up for handling run-ins among spacecraft, but no detailed regulations yet exist. The 1974 Convention on Registration of Objects Launched Into Outer Space requires signatory nations to report their space launch details to the UN. Presumably all do, but where they actually put the spacecraft is still up to their individual space agencies. There's no international regulation on where low-earth satellites — those orbiting at less than about 1,200 miles up — can operate.

Not-so-low-earth satellites are a different story. I speak here of geostationary satellites, which travel in a special orbit that allows them to remain in a fixed location relative to the earth's surface — a handy thing for communications and weather gear. The geostationary orbit is a relatively narrow ring about 22,300 miles above the equator. Because you need two degrees of separation between satellites to avoid radio interference, there are only 180 slots available. You can put multiple satellites in the same slot as long as they use different frequencies; nonetheless, these slots are a coveted commodity.

Seeing a chance to cash in, a group of equatorial countries issued the Bogota Declaration in 1976, claiming jurisdiction over the space above their countries. But as I've mentioned before, the declaration has been largely ignored, since the countries have no way to enforce it. Instead, the International Telecommunications Union, a UN agency, decides geostationary claims. For example, circa 1990 the tiny island nation of Tonga tried to reserve 16-plus slots for itself, possibly for speculative resale; other countries complained to the ITU, and Tonga settled for 6.

A bigger challenge is space debris — defunct satellites, booster rocket parts, and fragments of both. Mere regulation won't accomplish much — a lot of this stuff has been bouncing around the spaceways for decades. Hundreds of close calls happen each day. Admittedly "close call" is defined as approaching within one kilometer, which may sound like plenty of room. But some encounters are of a much closer kind:

  • In December 1991, debris from the Russian Cosmos 926 satellite hit the Cosmos 1934, an event that went unnoticed at the time and was only detected years later on analysis of old tracking data.
  • In July 1996, a small French satellite called Cerise suddenly started tumbling in orbit. The cause? A piece of space debris from an old U.S. rocket hit Cerise's stabilizing boom at over 31,000 MPH. Amazingly, the satellite recovered and completed its mission.
  • In January 2005, a piece of a Chinese rocket had a high-level meeting with a 31-year-old U.S. rocket booster, scattering new debris.

These impacts were in relatively low orbits, but even high orbits can be hazardous. In March 2006, a Russian telecommunications satellite in geostationary orbit was irreparably damaged following apparent impact with an unknown object. The same thing had seemingly happened to a geostationary European communications satellite in 1993.

So the forthcoming space traffic control agency has its work cut out for it. I'll volunteer to get on the horn with Luxembourg — nobody can tell me those jamokes need 16 satellites. But random debris is a tougher nut, and space cops alone won't crack it. Someday we'll need orbital street sweeping, too.

Dr. Kessler, we think your syndrome may be starting

This disturbing report just in.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Andrews, Edmund L., “Tiny Tonga Seeks Satellite Empire in Space,” New York Times (Aug. 28, 1990):

Andrews, Edmund L., “Satellite Gives Mir One More Close Call,” New York Times (Sept. 17, 1997):

Broad, William J., "Orbiting Junk, Once a Nuisance, Is Now a Threat," New York Times (Feb. 6, 2007):, "SATCAT Boxscore" (accessed Jan. 5, 2009):

Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, "CNES wins award for satellite collision risk management," (accessed Jan. 5, 2009):

David, Leonard, "Space Traffic Control: Steering Clear of Collisions," (May 5, 2004):

"Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries" (Bogota Declaration), adopted on December 3, 1976 (accessed Jan. 5, 2009):

Groshong, Kimm, "Impact suspected for loss of Russian satellite," New Scientist (March 31, 2006):

Hauck, Frederick H., et al., Protecting the Space Shuttle from Meteoroids and Orbital Debris (1997):

"International Space Station (ISS) Diary: Zarya and Unity" (accessed Jan. 5, 2009):

Laporte, Francois, and Sasot, Eloy, “Operational Management of Collision Risks for LEO Satellites at CNES,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 111468 (2008), presented at the SpaceOps 2008 Conference

Liou, J.-C. and Johnson, N.L., “Planetary Science: Risks in Space from Orbiting Debris,” Science 311 (20 January 2006): 340-341

Long, Mark E., Digital Satellite TV Handbook (1999), pp. 3ff.:,M1

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "International Space Station Status Report #99-41" (1999):

National Space Science Data Center (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), "Cerise" (accessed Jan. 5, 2009):

New York Times, "Space Shuttle Dodges Debris From Rocket” (Nov. 29, 1991):

Reichhardt, Tony, "Satellite Smashers: Space-faring nations: Clean up low Earth orbit or you're grounded," Air & Space Magazine (March 1, 2008):

Schäfer, Frank, "The Threat of Space Debris and Micrometeoroids to Spacecraft Operations," ERCIM News 65 (April 2006):, "Accidental Collisions of Cataloged Satellites Identified" (April 16, 2005):

Spotts, Peter N., "Does Space Need Air Traffic Control?" Christian Science Monitor, March 14, 2008:, "Shuttle Windshield Damaged by Space Debris" (Aug. 16, 2007):

Union of Concerned Scientists, "UCS Satellite Database," accessed Jan. 5, 2009:

Williams, T., & P. Collins, "Towards Traffic Control Systems for Near-Earth Space", Proc. 29th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, IISL (1986), pp. 161-170:

Recent Additions:

A Straight Dope Staff Report by SDStaff Melis, Straight Dope Science Advisory Board
A Straight Dope Staff Report by SDStaff Ken, Straight Dope Science Advisory Board
A Straight Dope Staff Report by SDStaff Ian, Straight Dope Science Advisory Board
A Straight Dope Staff Report by SDStaff Wolf, Straight Dope Advisory Board
A Straight Dope Classic by Cecil Adams
A Straight Dope Staff Report by SDStaff Songbird, Straight Dope Science Advisory Board
A Straight Dope Staff Report by SDStaff Songbird, Straight Dope Science Advisory Board

Send questions for Cecil Adams to:

Send comments about this website to:

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope! Your direct line to thou- sands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope? Write to:

Copyright © 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.