![]() |
[ Home Page | News | Archive | Books | Buy Stuff | FAQs, etc. ]
From Cecil's Mailbag by the Straight Dope Science Advisory Board
Dear Straight Dope:
I enjoyed your recent "Mountain Dew" article, especially its
reference
to "yellow #5," as it identified the actual chemical, tartrazine.
I may be dating myself by recalling the "red dye #2" panic and the
furor
about those deadly red M&M's. I also remember that very few
articles at
the time actually named the chemical itself.
My question is much more innocuous. Why are food-grade dyes
numbered,
instead of being identified by a chemical name? Who started this
system, and why? And how can I find out what "blue #2" is, so I
can
fret about my M&M's yet again? --Mike Harris
SDSTAFF Melis replies:
The numbering system has several purposes. First, it lets you know
that the Food and Drug Administration has approved the coloring for
consumer use. If the number is in the form "FD&C x," that
means the chemical can be used in food, drugs, and cosmetics. If
you see just a D&C, that means it was approved for only drugs and
cosmetics, not food. Second, the numbers alert you that this is, in
fact, an artificial coloring agent. Third, the numbers make for
much easier label-reading than the actual chemical names. If
there's any question of safety--if, for example, the product is
found to have long-term side effects--it's also easier to yank off
the shelf or avoid.
Some consumer advocates suggest we try to avoid products that are
artificially colored and/or flavored. Are there natural coloring
agents and flavorings? Sure, but the artificial stuff does have a
longer shelf life and is more consistent from batch to batch.
To find out the chemical names of the different products, as well
as to keep tabs on the
latest studies, keep an eye on Web sites like the FDA's home page
at http://www.fda.gov
--SDSTAFF Melis
Straight Dope Science Advisory
Board
Cecil's Mailbag is researched and written by members of the Straight Dope Science Advisory Board, Cecil's online auxiliary. Although the SDSAB does its best, these articles are edited by Ed Zotti, not Cecil, so accuracywise you'd better keep your fingers crossed.
[ Return to the Mailbag Archive ]
The Straight
Dope / Questions or
comments for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com
Comments regarding this website to: webmaster@straightdope.c
om
Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Chicago Reader, Inc. All rights
reserved.
No material contained in this site may be republished or reposted
without express written
permission.
The Straight Dope is a registered trademark of Chicago Reader, Inc.